Drawing for NIMBIL SELECT

USPTO serial 86357484

NIMBIL SELECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NIMBIL SELECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norm J. Rich

NORM J. RICH Foley & Lardner Llp3000 K St NW Fl 6Washington, DC 20007-5109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Gloves for medical use; latex medical gloves; surgical gloves; disposable gloves for medical and surgical use made of elastomers, including latex, nitrile, neoprene, chloroprene and polyisoprene, and thermoplasts, including vinyl; gloves for medical use, namely, medical examination gloves; all of the foregoing for use by medical professionalsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2016MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 20, 2016ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 20, 2016ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 14, 2016EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 3, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 13, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 22, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 22, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 1, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance