Drawing for VOCALZOOM

USPTO serial 86357567

VOCALZOOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VOCALZOOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

A. Tally Eitan

A TALLY EITAN EITAN MEHULAL & SADOT6480 Calverton Drive, Unit 202C/O EDNA EISEMANNFrederick, MD 21703

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic and optical communications instruments and components to be sold to manufacturers of mobile telecommunication devices, namely, hardware for use in speech enhancement and voice recognition, namely, electro-optical microphones and optical microphones for embedding into mobile telecommunication devices, phones, phone conference platforms, video conference platforms, tablets, smartphones, computers, headset, helmets, headgear and wearable communication devices; and Electronic and optical communications instruments and components to be sold to original equipment manufacturers (OEM) of computers and computer-based platforms, namely, hardware for use in speech enhancement and voice recognition, namely, electro-optical microphones and optical microphones for embedding into Automatic Teller Machines (ATM), self-service kiosk machines, and computers; and Electronic and optical communications instruments and components to be sold to vehicle manufacturers, namely, hardware for use in speech enhancement and voice recognition, namely, electro-optical microphones and optical microphones for embedding into vehicular entertainment systems, vehicular audio systems, vehicular speech enhancement systems, vehicular voice recognition systems, and vehicular sound systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 29, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 11, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 10, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 8, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 8, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 8, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 8, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 5, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 18, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 18, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 8, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 6, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 13, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 3, 2016TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Feb 3, 2016OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 3, 2016OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 13, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2015UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Sep 16, 2015OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 16, 2015OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 4, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 15, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 16, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 28, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 28, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance