USPTO serial 86357567
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Tally Eitan
A TALLY EITAN EITAN MEHULAL & SADOT6480 Calverton Drive, Unit 202C/O EDNA EISEMANNFrederick, MD 21703| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic and optical communications instruments and components to be sold to manufacturers of mobile telecommunication devices, namely, hardware for use in speech enhancement and voice recognition, namely, electro-optical microphones and optical microphones for embedding into mobile telecommunication devices, phones, phone conference platforms, video conference platforms, tablets, smartphones, computers, headset, helmets, headgear and wearable communication devices; and Electronic and optical communications instruments and components to be sold to original equipment manufacturers (OEM) of computers and computer-based platforms, namely, hardware for use in speech enhancement and voice recognition, namely, electro-optical microphones and optical microphones for embedding into Automatic Teller Machines (ATM), self-service kiosk machines, and computers; and Electronic and optical communications instruments and components to be sold to vehicle manufacturers, namely, hardware for use in speech enhancement and voice recognition, namely, electro-optical microphones and optical microphones for embedding into vehicular entertainment systems, vehicular audio systems, vehicular speech enhancement systems, vehicular voice recognition systems, and vehicular sound systems | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 17, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 8, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 3, 2016 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |