Drawing for SPORT ARMY

USPTO serial 86358914

SPORT ARMY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPORT ARMY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stuart E. Benson

Stuart E. Benson Manelli Selter PLLC2000 M Street, N.W., Suite 760Washington, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Sport memorabilia and collectibles, namely, limited edition photography prints, art prints, illustrations, mounted and unmounted photography, in the nature of printed photographs, posters, trading cards; authentically autographed sport memorabilia, namely, autographed printed pictures; stickers; pens; pencilsACTIVE—
025Apparel, namely, shirts, t-shirts, golf shirts, polo shirts, dress shirts, hats, sweatshirts, hoodies, pullovers, shorts, sweatpants, fleece tops and bottoms, pants, track suits, jogging suits, jackets, windshirts, windbreaker; scarves, gloves; headgear, namely, hats, visors, caps, toques, sweat bands, headbands; sports clothing, namely, shirts, hoodies, jackets; sports uniforms; team jerseys; reproduction sports jerseysACTIVE—
028Authentically autographed sport memorabilia, namely, decorative hockey pucks and decorative hockey sticksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 4, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 5, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 9, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 2, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 31, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 31, 2015ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 28, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 28, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 28, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 24, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 26, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 25, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 24, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance