USPTO serial 86359859
COLLABORATION ASSISTANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLLABORATION ASSISTANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY D. KRUGMAN
GARY D. KRUGMAN Sughrue Mion Pllc2100 Pennsylvania Ave NWWashington, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and peripheral devices; network routers; computer servers; computer storage servers; electronic apparatus and instruments, namely, computers, laptop computers, tablet computers, smartphones, network routers, automatic teller machines, electronic equipment for advertisement display monitors, keyboards, printers, scanners, radio transmitters, radio receivers, point-of-sales (POS) systems,, namely, point-of-sale terminals, bar code readers, optical readers, computer hardware, and computer operating software, interactive computer kiosks and internet kiosk comprising computers, computer hardware, computer peripherals, and computer operating software for use in connecting virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; transit apparatus and instruments, namely, network routers, computer servers, computer storage servers for use in connecting virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; computer software for use in connecting virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; computer application software for mobile phones, smartphones, portable media players, handheld computers, namely, software for use in connecting virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; downloadable cloud computing software for use in networking, data processing and connecting virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer hardware and software design; computer systems analysis; monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning; rental of computer hardware and computer software; providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; remote computer backup services; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for connecting virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; consulting services in the field of cloud computing services; computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NIPPON DENKI KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by NIPPON DENKI KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COLLABORATION ASSISTANT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 11, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 29, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |