Drawing for CITI TABLE

USPTO serial 86360337

CITI TABLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CANTOR, JILLIAN REDDING
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CITI TABLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Greene

JEFFREY H. GREENE Foley & Lardner Llp90 Park AveNew York, NY 10016-1301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035promoting the goods and services of others through administration of customer loyalty, reward and incentive programs featuring information and discounts on special events; advertising and marketing services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others in the field of social, charitable and non-profit causesACTIVE—
036electronic commerce services, namely, banking services in the nature of credit card transaction processing services; financial sponsorship of community events, namely community gardens, farmers markets, cooking demonstrations, and education programs and classesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 21, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 2, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 29, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 29, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 19, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 18, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance