Drawing for QUICK DRAW

USPTO serial 86360663

QUICK DRAW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUICK DRAW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kit M. Stetina

KIT M STETINA STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656-2681UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SPORTS GOGGLE LENS CHANGING SYSTEM CONSISTING OF GOGGLE LENSES, A CASE FOR HOLDING GOGGLE LENSES AND A HAND TOOL FOR REMOVING AND INSERTING GOGGLE LENSES SOLD TOGETHER AS A UNITACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 19, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 19, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 17, 2016EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 14, 2016RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Mar 29, 2016CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 29, 2016CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 8, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 16, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 16, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 18, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 26, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2014AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 4, 2014PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance