Drawing for DISCOVERY POWERED BY PRECISION

USPTO serial 86361058

DISCOVERY POWERED BY PRECISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISCOVERY POWERED BY PRECISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Pickerill

John Pickerill Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.200 S. 6th StreetSuite 4000Minneapolis, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Tablet packaging machines; medication vial filling machinesACTIVE—
009Incubators, namely, cell culture incubators, laboratory research incubators, incubators for laboratory applications; self-contained, GMP-compliant cell processing workstation for use in cell therapies, for laboratory and research use; computer graphics software; computer hardware; computer hardware and computer peripheral devices; computer hardware and software, for use with medical patient monitoring equipment, for receiving, processing, transmitting and displaying data; computer memories; computer networking hardware; medical software for processing and displaying images on ultrasound medical imaging machines; medical workstation comprised of computer hardware and software for gathering and transmitting patient image data for use during surgical procedures; temperature controllers for warming and cooling medical and surgical liquids, equipment and instruments; automatic tablet counting machines that also include a packaging function; medication counting machine also featuring a vial filling function; laboratory equipment, namely, orbital shakers; bio-clean benches, namely, laminar flow cabinets and similar enclosures featuring a filtered air supply, for laboratory and research use; electric ovens for laboratory useACTIVE—
010Incubators for medical use; dry heat sterilizers for medical useACTIVE—
011Freezers, namely, ultra-low freezers, cryogenic freezers, chest freezers, industrial freezers, biomedical freezers; refrigerators, namely, blood bank refrigerators, pharmaceutical refrigerators, laboratory refrigerators; cell processing workstations in the nature of clean room installations; electric autoclaves; dry heat sterilizers for laboratory useACTIVE—
021Non-electric autoclavesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 3, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 30, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 1, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 29, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 4, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 3, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 29, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 29, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 4, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 15, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 29, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 11, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance