Drawing for EFORCE

USPTO serial 86361090

EFORCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EFORCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael F. Sarney

MICHAEL F SARNEY MORITT HOCK & HAMROFF LLP450 7TH AVENUE15TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10123-0101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for use by clients and their employees in obtaining access to data pertaining to employee compensation and benefits, payroll, human resources and workplace rules and regulationsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2015MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 17, 2015ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 17, 2015OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 17, 2015OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 22, 2015OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 25, 2015ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 7, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 22, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 22, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 4, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 4, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 24, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance