USPTO serial 86361092
AICHELE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AICHELE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas M. McAllister
DOUGLAS M. MCALLISTER Lipsitz & McAllister Llc755 Main St Ste 8Monroe, CT 06468-2830UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine tools; machines and machine tools for cutting, cross-cutting, embossing, stamping, die-stamping, scoring, folding, perforating, blanking, forming, grooving, and ultrasound treating of workpieces, and parts thereof; rotary cutting machines and parts thereof; components for machine tools, namely, cutting, cross-cutting, embossing, stamping, die-stamping, scoring, folding, perforating, blanking, forming, grooving, and counter cutting tools, ultrasound workpiece treating tools, anvils, hard metal tools, tungsten carbide tools, diamond tools, and shock absorber devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Tools; cutting, cross-cutting, embossing, stamping, die-stamping, scoring, folding, perforating, blanking, forming, grooving, counter cutting, and ultrasound workpiece treating tools; hard metal tools, tungsten carbide tools, diamond tools; hand-operated tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, cleaning, repair and maintenance of machine tools and parts thereof; re-sharpening of cutting tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Treatment and transformation of materials; coating of machine components; coating with non-stick material; production and manufacturing services in the field of grinding, turning, milling, high frequency soldering, metal spraying, wire erosion, cutting, and coating | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, engineering services, and research and design services in the field of grinding, turning, milling, high frequency soldering, metal spraying, wire erosion, cutting, and coating; industrial analysis and research services in the field of grinding, turning, milling, high frequency soldering, metal spraying, wire erosion, cutting, and coating | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aichele Werkzeuge GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AICHELE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |