Drawing for EVERHEALTH

USPTO serial 86361193

EVERHEALTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVERHEALTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew L. Goldstein

ANDREW L. GOLDSTEIN FREEBORN & PETERS LLP311 S WACKER DR STE 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606-6679UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Health club services, namely, providing instruction and equipment in the field of physical exercise; physical fitness instruction services; educational services, namely, conducting classes and seminars relating to health and wellnessACTIVE—
044Hospitals; health care; home health care services; healthcare services, namely, occupational health services; medical services, namely, medical screening, performing diagnosis of diseases, medical testing for diagnostic or treatment purposes, surgery, physical rehabilitation and urgent and emergency care services; Medical services, namely, providing vaccinations and conducting medical and physical evaluations for school, camp and sports; patient population health management services for health care providers, namely, identifying gaps in patient care and managing the care for the identified patients by providing wellness programs; hospice care; behavioral health services, including, but not limited to addiction treatment and mental health treatment servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 18, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 15, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 29, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 28, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jun 21, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 21, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 19, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 17, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 17, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 30, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 19, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 19, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 11, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 9, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 9, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2015NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 24, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 4, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 18, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 12, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 5, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 5, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 21, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance