USPTO serial 86361617
NZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNKLEMAN, SARAH E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin Oliveira
KEVIN OLIVEIRA ODIN FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN PC1775 WIEHLE AVESTE 400RESTON, VA 20190-5159Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Conducting sporting and athletic programs to develop and promote sportsmanship, team play and athletic ability excluding recreational services in the nature of youth sports leagues and administration of youth sports leagues; educational and entertainment services, namely, sports and athletics programs, sports and athletics exhibitions, seminars and sports and athletics events in the fields of fitness, strength and conditioning training, nutrition, exercise, sports safety, sportsmanship and game officiating excluding recreational services in the nature of youth sports leagues and administration of youth sports leagues; providing sports and athletics information via a global computer network or a commercial on-line service; physical fitness instruction and health club services in the nature of providing instruction and equipment in the field of physical science; individual fitness training; fitness consulting; fitness and exercise facilities; entertainment and educational services, namely, classes in the fields of physical fitness, creative dance, tumbling, movement, and self-esteem building, and providing recreation facilities with computers and play areas for children; operation of sports and athletics, physical fitness and dance camps; instruction and training in sports and athletics, physical fitness, creative dance, tumbling, movement, fitness, strength and conditioning training, nutrition, exercise, sports safety, sportsmanship and game officiating; providing classes, seminars, workshops, after-school and evening recreational camps to promote health, social, educational, vocational and character development and in the fields of developing effective communications, interpersonal skills and effective personality characteristics and regarding and developing skills necessary for the attainment of personal objectives; counseling services, namely, teaching students to help others and to establish and promote health, social, educational, vocational and character development and in the fields of developing effective communications, interpersonal skills and effective personality characteristics and regarding and developing skills necessary for the attainment of personal objectives; educational services, namely, the training of others through courses, seminars, programs and workshops establishing and promoting health, social, educational, vocational and character development and in the field of developing effective communications, interpersonal skills and effective personality characteristics and regarding and developing skills necessary for the attainment of personal objectives | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |