Drawing for AVASTARS

USPTO serial 86361670

AVASTARS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AVASTARS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.

JOSEPH E WALSH JR HARNESS DICKEY & PIERCE PLC7700 BONHOMME AVE STE 400SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105-0032UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail stores, mail order, and online retail store services featuring toys, games, playthings, and sporting goodsACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, image capture services, and creation of personalized image data sets for use in producing still images, videos, and video games; Entertainment services in the nature of parties for creating customized dolls, action figures, videos, and video games; Providing interactive image editing, and modification; Entertainment services, namely, the production and distribution of interactive animated videos in the fields of live action and animated entertainment; Interactive and participatory video performances and interactive play areas; Custom production of videos and video games featuring characters made to resemble particular individualsACTIVE—
042Electronic storage of interactive electronic imagesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 7, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 23, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 21, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 5, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 10, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 20, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 29, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 14, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 17, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 15, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 15, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 15, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 15, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 22, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance