USPTO serial 86361797
SAM'S BEAUTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAM'S BEAUTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Morton Grove, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hyo Jung Kim
3501 ALGONQUIN ROADSUITE 600ROLLING MEADOWS, IL 60008Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | On-line wholesale and retail store services featuring human and synthetic hair in wigs, braids, extensions, weaves, pony tails, beauty aids, and accessories, hair care products, preparations and accessories, cosmetics, make-up, skincare and beauty products and accessories, nail grooming products, costume jewelry, jewelry and imitation jewelry, hair jewelry in the nature of jewelry for use in the hair and eyewear namely, sunglasses and eyeglasses; Retail store services featuring human and synthetic hair in wigs, braids, extensions, weaves, pony tails, beauty aids, and accessories, hair care products, preparations and accessories, cosmetics, make-up, skincare and beauty products and accessories, nail grooming products, costume jewelry, jewelry and imitation jewelry, hair jewelry in the nature of jewelry for use in the hair and eyewear namely, sunglasses and eyeglasses; Retail store services featuring human and synthetic hair in wigs, braids, extensions, weaves, pony tails, beauty aids, and accessories, hair care products, preparations and accessories, cosmetics, make-up, skincare and beauty products and accessories, nail grooming products, costume jewelry, jewelry and imitation jewelry, hair jewelry in the nature of jewelry for use in the hair and eyewear namely, sunglasses and eyeglasses accessible on-line and by telephone, facsimile and mail order | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |