USPTO serial 86362035
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emily Rokeach
EMILY ROKEACH EARTHBOUND LLC156 5TH AVE FL 10NEW YORK, NY 10010-7751UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Containers, not of metal for commercial use; Plastic boxes; Plastic boxes for packaging consumer and retail items | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Bakery desserts; Bakery goods; Bakery goods and dessert items, namely, cakes, cookies, pastries, candies, and frozen confections for retail and wholesale distribution and consumption on or off the premises; Bakery goods and dessert items, namely, cheesecakes for retail and wholesale distribution and consumption on or off the premises; Bakery products; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods; Baking powder; Baking spices; Bases for bakery goods; Biscuits and bread; Bread; Bread and buns; Bread and pastry; Bread bases; Bread mixes; Bread rolls; Breakfast cereals; Cake mixes; Cereal based snack food; Confectionery chips for baking; Edible flour; Edible fruit ices; Flour; Flour for food; Food package combinations consisting primarily of bread, crackers and/or cookies; Frozen breads; Frozen dough for use as pizza, bread or other bread-type products; Frozen foods, namely, grain and bread based appetizers, hors d'oeuvres, and canapés; Fruit ices; Gluten-free desserts, namely, cakes, cookies, pastries, candies, and frozen confections for retail and wholesale distribution and consumption on or off the premises; Honey; Honey; Mixes for bakery goods; Mustard; Pastry; Rice; Sago; Salad dressing; Salad dressings; Salt; Sauces; Spices; Spices and ice; Sugar; Sugarless candies; Tapioca; Vinegar; Yeast | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2015 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 5, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |