USPTO serial 86362146
TEN FINE MALE CHILD CLOTHIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TEN FINE MALE CHILD CLOTHIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Custom engraved metal medical information identification cards, tags, bracelets and necklaces, not magnetically encoded and not to function as jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Pen lights | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 014 | Body jewelry; Bracelets; Broaches; Bronze jewelry; Charms; Children's jewelry; Costume jewelry; Gemstone jewelry; Hair jewelry in the nature of jewelry for use in the hair; Identification bracelets; Inexpensive non-jewelry watches; Jewelry and imitation jewelry; Jewelry for the head; Jewelry pins for use on hats; Jewelry watches; Jewelry, namely, dog tags for wear by humans for decorative purposes; Plastic bracelets in the nature of jewelry; Rings; Women's jewelry | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 016 | Ball point pens | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 025 | Athletic shoes; Baseball caps and hats; Body suits for baby's and toddlers; Bow ties; Business wear, namely, suits, jackets, trousers, blazers, blouses, shirts, skirts, dresses and footwear; Canvas shoes; Clothing for babies, toddlers and children, treated with fire and heat retardants, namely, pajamas, jackets, shirts, pants, jumpers; Collared shirts; Deck-shoes; Dress pants; Dress shirts; Dress suits; Fur hats; Graphic T-shirts; Hats for infants, babies, toddlers and children; Hooded sweat shirts; Infants' shoes and boots; Jogging suits; Leather hats; Leather shoes; Leisure suits; Long-sleeved shirts; Lounge pants; Men's suits; Pants; Polo shirts; Ramie shirts; Running shoes; Shirts and short-sleeved shirts; Shirts for infants, babies, toddlers and children; Shirts for suits; Shirts for children with allergies; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; Suit coats; Suits; T-shirts; Tennis shoes; Ties; Toboggan hats; Toboggan hats, pants and caps; Woolly hats | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 040 | Imprinting of decorative designs on T-shirts; Silk screen printing | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Evans,Tamara Nicole
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named TEN FINE MALE CHILD CLOTHIER
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |