USPTO serial 86362951
HOCKEY SAVES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOCKEY SAVES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TROY G. WOOLLEN
TROY G. WOOLLEN BIRD LOECHL BRITTAIN & MCCANTS LLC3414 PEACHTREE RD NE STE 1150ATLANTA, GA 30326UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Action figures, balloons, bobble head dolls, Christmas tree ornaments, dolls, elbow pads for athletic use; knee pads for athletic use; shin pads for athletic use, flying discs, goalie masks for hockey; plastic and wood goalie sticks for hockey, golf bags, head covers for golf clubs, field hockey balls, hockey gloves, hockey pucks, hockey sticks, ice skates, in-line and conventional roller skates, miniature toy goalie masks, novelty golf balls, plastic toy canteens, plush toy animals, cheerleading pompoms, pool cues, puppets, puzzles, ice skate blade covers and guards, suction cup animals in the nature of toy animal figures with suction cups attached to the figure's limbs, suction cup pucks in the nature of toy hockey pucks with suction cups attached to the object, tabletop rod hockey games, hand held units for playing video games, sports equipment bags specially adapted for hockey equipment, coin-operated interactive video games, video game interactive hand held remote controls for playing electronic games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2014 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2014 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |