Drawing for ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 86363382

ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew C. Sensi

MICHAEL P FORTKORT MICHAEL FORTKORT PC13164 LAZY GLEN LANEOAK HILL, VA 20171UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Merchant accounts, namely, merchant banking services; credit and debit card processing or handling, authorization and clearing; merchant accounts in the field of finance, namely, provision of monthly financial statements online; financial services, namely, provision of merchant account interchange qualification reporting, chargeback and retrieval information, provision of daily deposit summaries for review, retrieval of requests for sales and credit slips and credit match verification; financial services, namely, processing all types of credit cards and debit cardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 6, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 6, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 6, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 15, 2016EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 23, 2016GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2016GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2016CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 30, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 18, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 28, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 7, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 7, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 7, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 7, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 7, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 3, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance