USPTO serial 86364698
!N TOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHILLIPS, WENDELL SHARMAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with !N TOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Martine
Peter Martine Martine Penilla Group LLP710 Lakeway Dr.Ste. 200Sunnyvale, CA 94085Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE PLATFORMS ALL FOR MARKETING FOR CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT IN RETAIL STORES UTILIZING CUSTOMER PORTABLE DEVICES AND FOR PRESENTATION TO RETAIL STORE CUSTOMERS OF GOODS; INTEGRATION OF CUSTOMER DATA FOR ENGAGEMENT IN RETAIL STORES AND CUSTOMER RESPONSE ANALYSIS; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS COMPRISING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT, COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT IN RETAIL STORES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 24, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 9, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |