USPTO serial 86365748
SIMPLY PREPAID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIMPLY PREPAID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MOLLY BUCK RICHARD
MOLLY BUCK RICHARD RICHARD LAW GROUP5910 N. CENTRAL EXPRESSWAYSUITE 325DALLAS, TX 75206Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services and on-line retail store services featuring handheld computers, tablet computers, radio transceivers configured as data sticks with USB connectivity, wireless access points, wireless signal repeaters, femtocells, picocells and wireless modems, and featuring wireless telecommunications device accessories, namely, smart cards containing programming used to interact with wireless telecommunications devices and respond to a signal contact that requests customer identification and account information, memory cards, carrying cases for wireless telecommunications devices, gel skins in the nature of rubber coverings for protecting wireless telephones and smartphones, handheld computers, and tablet computers, removable faceplates for wireless phones and smartphones, removable back covers for wireless phones and smartphones, adhesive vinyl covers for wireless phones and smartphones, protective transparent display coverings, namely, plastic transparent films for covering and providing a scratch proof barrier or protection for displays on wireless telephones and smartphones, handheld computers, and tablet computers, audio cables, USB cables, wired and wireless hands-free microphone and earphone adapters, audio speakers, stereo headphones, earbuds, ear bud covers, batteries, battery chargers, car battery chargers, wall battery chargers, power adaptors, belt clip holsters for carrying wireless phones and smartphones, docking stations for recharging of wireless phones, smartphones and tablet computers, in-vehicle holders for holding and charging wireless phones and smartphones, fitted wireless phone and smartphone pouches; online retail store services featuring wireless telecommunications devices, namely, wireless telephones and smartphones; retail store services and online retail store services featuring prepaid wireless services cards; on-line retail store services featuring prepaid wireless telecommunications rate plans | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2025 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2014 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |