USPTO serial 86365842
CORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 20, 2017
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- —
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BEVERLY HILLS, CA, US
LONG BEACH, CA, US
Oakland, CA, US
Oakland, CA, US
OAKLAND, CA, US
OAKLAND, CA, US
OAKLAND, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam D. Mandell
Adam D. Mandell Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon Blvd., Ste 1400Arlington, VA 22201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ Grab-and-go vegetable and fruit-based salads; vegetable or fruit chips; seasoned or prepared nuts; pickles and other preserved vegetables and /or fruits; nut, seed, bean and vegetable-based burgers; nut, seed, bean and vegetable-based pates; vegetable soups; vegetable stews; chia, coconut, nut, and fruit-based puddings and whips; nut, seed, fruit, bean, and vegetable-based spreads ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 15, 2015 |
| 030 | [ Oatmeal; grain and nut-based cooked and raw breakfast cereals; raw and cooked vegetable wrap sandwiches, sandwiches, tacos, burritos, sushi, and vegetable kebabs; vegetable stir fry, vegetable hash, and ratatouilles; stuffed vegetables and fruits; vegetable-based pastas; legume, tuber, and vegetable-based burgers; cacao-based puddings and whips, frozen confections; ice cream; popcorn; crackers; ] cacao, nut, bean, seed, grain, and date-based confections, namely, chocolate, brownies [, and cookies; salad dressings; salsas; nut, grain, and seed-based beverages; nut, seed, fruit, bean, and vegetable-based sauces and condiments, namely, dips, hummus, muhammara, baba ghanoush, sour cream, guacamole, tzatziki, pestos, chutneys, mustards, tomato-based sauces, aiolis, barbecue sauces, teriyaki sauces, hot sauces; and marinades ] | ACTIVE | Dec 15, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MUSE NUTRITION, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CORE FOODS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CORE Method, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CORE Method, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CORE METHOD, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CORE FOODS COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by CORE FOODS COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CORE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 29, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2024 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 29, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 20, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 18, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 5, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 29, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 11, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |