Drawing for ULTRAWRAP

USPTO serial 86366395

ULTRAWRAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRAWRAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori K. Hall

LORI K. HALL GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLPONE MAIN STREET WESTHAMILTON, ONTARIO, L8P4Z5CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012functional and decorative plastic parts for automobiles manufactured using a special technology to wrap parts with a decorative layer, namely, interior plastic decorative trim for the instrument panel, interior decorative trim for the front and rear doors, glovebox, center stack bezel, cluster bezel, floor console, rear seat trim, rear seat tray, rear seat cupholder, and air vent coveringACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 2, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 7, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 12, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 8, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 1, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 19, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 6, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 21, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 21, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 20, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 18, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance