USPTO serial 86367981
MUTATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MUTATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Clarita, CA
Santa Clarita, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kanika Radhakrishnan
KANIKA RADHAKRISHNAN EVERGREEN VALLEY LAW GROUP2570 N 1ST ST STE 200SAN JOSE, CA 95131-1037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | health or nutritional supplement | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 16, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |