Drawing for LOU LOU

USPTO serial 86369004

LOU LOU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LOU LOU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVEN A ABREU

STEVEN A ABREU SUNSTEIN LLP100 HIGH STREET 20TH FLOORBOSTON, MA 02110-2321UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring jewelry, watches, handbags, clutch bags, wallets, eye glasses, sunglasses; online retail store services featuring jewelry, watches, handbags, clutch bags, wallets, eye glasses, sunglassesABANDONEDDec 31, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2022MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 15, 2022ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 15, 2022OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 15, 2022OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 10, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2019OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 1, 2019ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 27, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 27, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 3, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 3, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 3, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 6, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 6, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 16, 2018AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2018IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 15, 2018AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 15, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 10, 2018EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 14, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 24, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 13, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 29, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 14, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 9, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 24, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 3, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance