USPTO serial 86371419
KARIZMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KARIZMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vasant Vihar New Delhi, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Burlingame
ROBERT B BURLINGAME PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPPO BOX 2824SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94126-2824UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Land vehicles; two-wheeled motor vehicles; motorcycles; handlebars; motorcycle seats; seat coverings for vehicles; direction signals and direction signal warning alarms for vehicles; vehicle parts, namely, sun visors and windshield visors; fenders for vehicles; inner tubes and tires; tubeless tires for vehicles; patches for vehicle tires and inner tubes; weld patches for use with vehicles; valves for vehicle tires; rear view mirrors; side view mirrors; vehicle parts, namely, tire chains; saddles for motorcycles; vehicle tire inflating pumps; burglar alarms for vehicles; anti-theft devices for vehicles; horns for vehicles; chassis for motor vehicles; chains for motor vehicles; axle journals; axles for vehicles; brakes for vehicles; brake linings, segments and shoes for vehicles; caps for vehicle gas tanks; casings for pneumatic tires; motor vehicle pedal accessories, namely, cleats; spoke clips for wheels; clutches for land vehicles; driving chains and motors for land vehicles; elevating tailgates for land vehicles; engines for land vehicles; motors for two-wheeled land vehicles; gearboxes; mudguards; propulsion mechanisms for land vehicles; repair outfits in the nature of kits for repairing inner tubes, primarily comprised of patches; rims for vehicles wheels; shock absorbers for two-wheeled vehicles; shock absorbing springs for vehicles; brake shoes for vehicles; spikes for tires; anti-skid studs for vehicle tires; suspension springs for two-wheeled land vehicles; vehicle covers for two-wheeled vehicles; saddle covers for motorcycles; transmissions for land vehicles; vehicle wheels; wheel spokes for two-wheeled land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair, maintenance, installation and servicing of vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |