USPTO serial 86371665
ELASTIC SERVICE PLATFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4943086Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 19, 2016
- Examiner
- STRINGER, DANIEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ELASTIC SERVICE PLATFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria Carver
VICTORIA CARVER Carver LawPO Box 206Bellefonte, PA 16823-0206Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing an online, non-downloadable integrated computer software application for the management and delivery of elastic IT support services by monitoring software agents and indicators that trigger workflow based on algorithms and business rules for aggregating supply and demand indicators, enabling customer self-service operation and IT support service provider operation for orchestrating, monitoring, and managing the placement of service orders and receipt of services and enables the dynamic matching of supply and demand services for provisioning, managing, securing, monitoring, and maintaining virtual and physical end user devices, servers, storage, memory, networks, software applications, web portals, software development platforms, and databases, and for monitoring program and project management, policy administration and compliance, enterprise architecture, capital planning, and investment control, software engineering, infrastructure engineering and maintenance, network security management, reporting, configuration management, security and diagnostics continuous monitoring and management, user support, infrastructure operations and maintenance, and document operations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 26, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 19, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |