USPTO serial 86372808
RH KITCHEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RH KITCHEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. McCue
MICHAEL J. MCCUE LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER LLP3993 HOWARD HUGHES PKWY STE 600LAS VEGAS, NV 89169-5996UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Serving trays and platters; decorative bowls; bottle stoppers specially adapted for use with wine bottles; wine openers; wine caddies; corkscrews; drinking glasses, namely, tumblers, wine glasses, shot glasses, beer steins, mugs, tea cups, water bottles sold empty; bowls, namely, serving bowls, salad bowls, sugar bowls; crockery; cookie cutters; cookie presses; colanders; skillets; pans; tins; cookie sheets; crock pots; rolling pins; spatulas; whisks; plates, namely, cake plates, dessert plates, decorative plates, dinner plates; cake stands; trivets; graters; salt and pepper shakers; garlic presses; table place card holders not of precious metal; napkin rings; carving boards; serving tongs; mixers; beaters; mashers; vegetable brushes; utensils for barbecues, namely, forks, tongs, turners, skewers, flippers, spatulas, and scrapers; drawer pulls of glass, porcelain or earthenware; plastic storage containers for household use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 1, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |