Drawing for GRAY MATTER

USPTO serial 86373338

GRAY MATTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRAY MATTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carl I. Brundidge

CARL I BRUNDIDGE BRUNDIDGE & STANGER PC2318 MILL RDSUITE 1020ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-6834

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cognitive training platform, namely, downloadable computer software for performing cognitive skills training accessible via a communication networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 1, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 1, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 20, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 12, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 3, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 3, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 31, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 31, 2017PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
May 30, 2017ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
May 19, 2017PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 19, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 16, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 16, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 15, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 15, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 15, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 18, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 18, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 26, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 8, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 11, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance