Drawing for GROHEN TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

USPTO serial 86373564

GROHEN TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GROHEN TECHNOLOGIES LTD.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetic body scrubs for the face; Facial cleansers; Facial moisturizers; Facial oils; Facial washesACTIVEFeb 22, 2011
005Medical lubricant, namely, vaginal lubricants; Vaginal moisturizers; Vaginal washesACTIVEFeb 22, 2011
010Vaginal syringesACTIVEFeb 22, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 31, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 31, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 31, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 11, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 15, 2014CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 13, 2014GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2014GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2014CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Dec 5, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance