CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SIPALERT

USPTO serial 86374923

SIPALERT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIPALERT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter Gluck

PETER GLUCK PATNSTR, APC26892 Preciados DriveMission Viejo, CA 92691UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Drinking vessels, namely, containers with a timer for alerting or reminding a user when to consume the beverageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 1, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 12, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 12, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 16, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 16, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 18, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 29, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 13, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 27, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 23, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 15, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 15, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 15, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 8, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance