Drawing for PLANT IT FORWARD

USPTO serial 86376922

PLANT IT FORWARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLANT IT FORWARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie E. Reitz

Julie E. Reitz Honigman Miller Schwartz & Cohn LLP39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Frozen entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry and/or vegetables; vegetable crispsACTIVE—
030Breakfast cereals; processed cereal-derived food product to be used as a breakfast cereal, snack food, or ingredient for making food; oatmeal; cereal-based snack foods; grain-based snack foods; crackers; cookies; cereal bars; cereal-based food bars; granola bars; frozen waffles; frozen pizza; pilaf; frozen entrees consisting primarily of pasta or grainsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2017MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 19, 2017ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 18, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 1, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 13, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 9, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 9, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 8, 2015PBERWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Dec 31, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 31, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 12, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 10, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance