Drawing for PLX

USPTO serial 86377636

PLX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TENG, SIMON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Strozier

ROBERT W. STROZIER ROBERT W. STROZIER, PLLCPO BOX 429BELLAIRE, TX 77402-0429UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical and nutraceutical preparations, namely, phospholipid-associated, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agentsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 22, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 20, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 15, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 15, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 6, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Dec 15, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 20, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 20, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 30, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 16, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 11, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 11, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Sep 11, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 11, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 11, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 4, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 4, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 28, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 14, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Aug 14, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 14, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jul 9, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 9, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 11, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 9, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 29, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance