USPTO serial 86378368
ONEDOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONEDOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oklahoma City, OK
Oklahoma City, OK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clifford C. Dougherty, III
CLIFFORD C. DOUGHERTY, III MCAFEE & TAFT211 N ROBINSON AVE FL 10OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102-7176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing an interactive website that provides health care consumers with pricing information regarding health care professionals and health care facilities; providing an interactive marketing website that allows health care practitioners and facilities to market their services; providing an interactive appointment scheduling website that allows healthcare consumers to schedule appointments and procedures with health care practitioners and health care facilities online | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | providing an interactive website that allows health care consumers to raise money for a specific health care procedure or surgery | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Providing an interactive website that provides general health care information to health care consumers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OneDoc, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by OneDoc, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ONEDOC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 12, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 29, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 9, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 1, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |