Drawing for SEASON WITH AUTHORITY

USPTO serial 86381349

SEASON WITH AUTHORITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARESCA, MEREDITH Z
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEASON WITH AUTHORITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher D. Olszyk, Jr.

CHRISTOPHER D. OLSZYK, JR. FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP997 LENOX DR BLDG 3LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ 08648-2317UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Cook books; Series of non-fiction books in the field of cookingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 31, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 28, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 5, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 3, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 31, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 29, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 10, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 27, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 8, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 8, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 8, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 31, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 6, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 11, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 22, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 19, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance