Drawing for BEYOND WIRELESS

USPTO serial 86381722

BEYOND WIRELESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUTLER, ANDREA P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEYOND WIRELESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Krieger, Jennifer Ko Craft & Joanna M. Myers

John L. Krieger, Jennifer Ko Craft & Joanna M. Mye Dickinson Wright PLLC8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200Las Vegas, NV 89113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Wireless cellular phone headsets; Wireless communication device featuring voice, data and image transmission including voice, text, and picture messaging, a video and still image camera, also functional to purchase music, games, video and software applications over the air for downloading to the device; Wireless communication devices for transmitting images taken by a camera; Wireless communication devices for voice, data or image transmissionACTIVE
038Wireless broadband communication services; Wireless telephone telecommunications services, namely, wireless mobile telephone calling plansACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 23, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 23, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2016WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED
Jan 23, 2016WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED
Oct 20, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 25, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 25, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 21, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 21, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 8, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 2, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 20, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 20, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 20, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Sep 11, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 3, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance