Drawing for INSTITUTE FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY OF EATING

USPTO serial 86381966

INSTITUTE FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY OF EATING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4967151Status 702Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 31, 2016
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with INSTITUTE FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY OF EATING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

N. Alexander Nolte

N. Alexander Nolte Nolte Lackenbach SiegelOne Chase RoadSCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational speaking services in the field of mind and body health and holistic nutrition; Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, workshops, training and retreats in the field of mind and body health and holistic nutrition and the distribution of course and training materials in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, training of coaches for certification in the field of mind and body health and holistic nutrition; interactive on-line training services in the field of mind and body health and holistic nutrition; on-line journals, namely, blogs featuring information and resources in the field of mind and body health and holistic nutrition; professional coaching services in the field of businessACTIVEMay 1, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2022NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2022C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 7, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 27, 2022E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 31, 2021REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 31, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 15, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 24, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 30, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 30, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 30, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 30, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 29, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance