USPTO serial 86382565
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Tourmakeady, Co. Mayo, IE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard M. Cohn
HOWARD M. COHN HOWARD M. COHN & ASSOCIATES30195 CHAGRIN BLVD STE 300CLEVELAND, OH 44124-5703UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic radio frequency transponder chip modules having a contact and a contactless interface containing an integrated circuit and system software used to store and retrieve electronic value and data, namely, account numbers, electronic cash, tickets, loyalty points, electronic keys, encrypted data and biometric templates; hardware for the operation of radio frequency identification transponder chip modules having dual communication interfaces, namely, a contact interface and a contactless interface, said transponder chip modules for implanting in a card body to form a passive dual interface smartcard or electronic tag; for insertion in a token, SIM card, USB fob, key or wearable device for handshake communication with a computer device, for insertion in a mobile device for active near field communication, or for attachment to a badge or data carrier for identification and verification purposes; hardware for the operation of radio frequency identification transponder chip modules having a pure contactless interface, namely, contactless transponder chip modules for implanting or insertion in a card body, tag, fob, SIM card, key or wearable device; hardware for the operation of radio frequency identification transponder chip modules having a pure contactless interface or dual communication interface having an engraved or etched logo in the center of its face up side with contact pads (6 or 8) or without contact pads and an etched antenna structure on its face down side for contactless communication; software for the operation of radio frequency identification transponder chip modules in applications namely, secure access control, biometric information checking, verification of personnel credentials and privileges and copyright protection; software for the operation of radio frequency identification transponder chip modules in ticketing and payment applications, namely electronic transactions, such as Europay, Mastercard, Visa (EMV) payment, micro-payment, e-couponing, e-loyalty programs, vending, electronic purse, exchange and e-commerce as well as ticketing in transportation, event ticketing and seat assignment; software for the operation of radio frequency identification transponder chip modules in network security applications, namely, network login, encryption and decryption process, authentication and verification for the purpose of secure identification; software for the operation of the radio frequency identification transponder chip modules to communicate with interface network computer hardware between electronic radio frequency identification device readers, point of sale terminals and data transmission lines or computers, user manuals for all the aforesaid goods sold therewith as a unit; and structural parts for the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |