USPTO serial 86382937
RYFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NGUYEN, NICOLE ASHLEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RYFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brendan J. Hughes
BRENDAN J. HUGHES COOLEY LLP1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2431UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing appliances and systems, namely, computers, memory modules and computer programs for use in storing content, documents, data and media; computer software for data management; computer software and hardware for use in the fields of knowledge management and data analytics, namely, computer software and hardware for the collection, aggregation, processing, management, storage, analysis, and transmission of business information and data; high performance computing hardware for use in the fields of knowledge management and data analytics; all of the foregoing to exclude software and computer hardware related to network functions virtualization, physical security, and electronic security systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware, namely, high performance computer hardware for use in the fields of knowledge management and data analytics; computer consulting services in the field of knowledge management, namely, for the collection, aggregation, processing, management, storage, analysis, and transmission of business information and data; all of the foregoing to exclude services related to network functions virtualization, physical security, and electronic security systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RYFT SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RYFT SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Data Design Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RYFT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |