Drawing for HYDROCLEANSE

USPTO serial 86384676

HYDROCLEANSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COGAN, BRITTNEY LORRAINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYDROCLEANSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anne E. Naffziger

ANNE E NAFFZIGER LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER1981 N BROADWAYSTE 310WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596-3841

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Medical cleansers for skin and wounds, namely, a saline solution intended for the cleansing, irrigation, moistening, debridement and removal of foreign material from wounds, dermal lesions and ulcers, post-surgical wounds, burns, abrasions, ingrown toe nails, grafted/donor skin sites; Medical cleansers for skin and wounds, namely, a saline solution to moisten and lubricate wound dressingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 21, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 21, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 11, 2016EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Jan 1, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 1, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 1, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 29, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 29, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 29, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 30, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 30, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 15, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance