USPTO serial 86385448
PHIL-AM FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHIL-AM FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jersey City, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cecilia L. Yu
CECILIA L. YU LAW OFFICES OF CECILIA L. YU & ASSOCIATES17890 CASTLETON ST STE 302CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91748-5859UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, not live, and chicken; preserved, dried, frozen and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies; jams; processed beans and nuts; dried, frozen seafood; dried edible seaweed; seafood extract; canned cooked meat; canned seafood; canned vegetables; evaporated milk; eggs; milk; condensed milk; coconut milk powder; cheese; yogurt; edible oils and fats; potato chips; soup and soup mixes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Baking powder; baking soda; biscuits; breads; processed cereals; breakfast cereals; bubble gum; cakes and cake mixes; pies; candy; caramel popcorn; caramels; chili powders; cookies; crackers and cheese combinations; crackers; dumplings; egg rolls and egg roll wrappers; food starch; flour; fruit sauces excluding cranberry sauce and apple sauce; ginger; coffee; tea; processed herbs; spices and seasonings; ice cream; cones for ice cream; flavored ices; ketchup; pasta; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta; noodles; oatmeal; processed oats; pancakes; pancake mixes; table syrup; corn syrup; flavoring syrups; pickled ginger in the nature of sliced pickled ginger; pickle relish; puddings; rice; rice cakes; salt; sauces; salad dressing; sugar; sushi; tortilla chips; vinegar; wafers; waffles; processed wheat; won tons and won ton wrappers; yeast; and frozen yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2015 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |