USPTO serial 86389465
BODYWORN THE ULTIMATE WITNESS UU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BODYWORN THE ULTIMATE WITNESS UU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen M. Schaetzel
STEPHEN M SCHAETZEL MEUNIER CARLIN & CURFMAN LLC999 PEACHTREE ST NESUITE 1300ATLANTA, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cameras; Cellular phones; Digital cameras; Microphones | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use with wireless mobile devices for use in obtaining, recording, storing and maintaining data and other records and evidence, including video and audio; Consulting services in the field of collection of evidence for forensic purposes; Providing information in the field of collection of evidence for forensic purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |