Drawing for EVERMORE

USPTO serial 86389789

EVERMORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVERMORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jared L. Cherry

JARED L. CHERRY PHILLIPS, RYTHER & WINCHESTER124 S 600 ESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84102-1909UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Interactive video game programs; Motion picture films about the development, construction, and operation of a theme parkACTIVE—
014Commemorative coinsACTIVE—
016Series of fiction works, namely, novels and books; Story booksACTIVE—
021Cups and mugsACTIVE—
028Game cards; Modeled plastic toy figurines; Stuffed and plush toysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 8, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 21, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 19, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 4, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 5, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 1, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 29, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 8, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 6, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 24, 2016ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 7, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 20, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 31, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 25, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 24, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 20, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 19, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance