USPTO serial 86390264
SECURFLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 5, 2018
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 704 applies to Madrid Protocol extensions of protection in the U.S. Section 71 (similar to Section 8) showing continued use was accepted. The U.S. extension remains active. Follow Madrid and USPTO deadlines for the next renewal cycle.
Need help with SECURFLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LAVAL, CA
LAVAL (Quebec), CA
LAVAL (Quebec), CA
LAVAL (Quebec), CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Denis V. Shamo
Ruben Rausings gataTetra Pak - Trademark DepartmentLund, 22186Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Industrial robots for detecting, analyzing, extracting and collecting products on conveying lines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Scientific, electronic, electrical, optical, weighing, measuring, signaling, checking (supervision) apparatus and instruments for controlling and checking of products on conveying lines, namely, presence detectors, movement detectors, weighing machines, optical or laser detectors, data analysis devices for quality controls; electric installations for the remote control of industrial operations, namely, data networks and control tools for off-site remote access to machines involved in an industrial treatment line for controlling and piloting their activity; data processing apparatus and computer software for controlling of products on conveying lines | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair, maintenance, assembly, mounting and installation of quality control measurement devices for conveying lines | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ Industrial analysis and research services in relation to data processing equipment and computer software for controlling of products on conveying lines; Design and development of data processing equipment and software for controlling of products on conveying lines ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SIDEL CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GEBO CERMEX CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GEBO CERMEX CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GEBO CERMEX CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SECURFLOW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2025 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2024 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 5, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 3, 2018 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| May 3, 2018 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 30, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2017 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 2, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |