Drawing for DIE CUTS WITH A VIEW

USPTO serial 86390484

DIE CUTS WITH A VIEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIE CUTS WITH A VIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brick Power

Brick Power Durham Jones & Pinegar, P.C.3301 N. Thanksgiving Way, Suite 400Intellectual Property Law GroupLehi, UT 84043

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paper; Craft paper; Scrapbooking paper; Scrapbooking products, namely, paper and stickers; Scrapbooking materials, namely, paper; Stickers; Decals; Home décor in the nature of stickers; Décor in the nature of stickersACTIVE—
042Consultation services in the fields of design of scrapbooks, paper crafts, and home décor; Consultation services in the field of design of scrapbooks; Information services in the fields of design of scrapbooks, paper crafts, and home décor; Providing information in the field of design of scrapbooksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2018PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Dec 9, 2017PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 28, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 27, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 17, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2017PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 16, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 24, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 8, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 6, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 26, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 1, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 10, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 21, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance