USPTO serial 86391609
NUDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew D. Kendall
MATTHEW D. KENDALL GRADNER, LINN, BURKHART & FLORY, LLP2851 CHARLEVOIX DR SE STE 207GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49546-7090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for registered users to track and add information to the profiles of their network of contacts including personal, business and social data; Social introduction and networking services; Computer software enabling business and social networking, storing and managing personal and business contacts, searching and reviewing internet content connecting with other users and sharing network contact information; Computer software enabling businesses to track, report networking activities of others, namely, accessing information regarding business relationships | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online business networking website to recommend professional networking communications between individuals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring technology that enables registered users to provide recommendations on content, text, images, photos, and messages sourced from the internet or internal business content libraries, that can be sent to contacts to facilitate communication; computer services, namely hosting virtual on-line community web site for registered users to organize groups, participate in discussions, aggregate information and resources, and engage in social, business and community networking; hosting of digital content online; hosting an interactive website and online non-downloadable software for uploading, downloading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging, sharing and transmitting messages, comments, multimedia content, videos, photos, images, audio, text, information; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for registered users to track and add information to the profiles of their network of contacts including personal, business and social data; social introduction and networking services; hosting an online website community for registered users to exchange information, photos, audio and video content and engage in communication and collaboration between and among themselves, to form groups (teams) and to engage in social networking | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |