Drawing for STRENGTH IN DATA

USPTO serial 86392310

STRENGTH IN DATA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WILLIS, PAMELA Y
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRENGTH IN DATA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brendan J. Hughes

BRENDAN J. HUGHES COOLEY LLP1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2431UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and hardware for use in the collection, aggregation, processing, management, storage, analysis, and transmission of business information and data; server operating software; data processing equipmentACTIVE
035Collection, aggregation, processing, management, and analysis of business information and data; database management and data processing servicesACTIVE
042Design and development of computer software; computer consulting services in the field of knowledge management, namely, for the collection, aggregation, processing, management, storage, analysis, and transmission of business information and data into computer databases; computer services, namely, monitoring the web sites of others to improve scalability and performance of web sites of others; web integration and automation, namely, searching and retrieving information from databases and computer networks, creating indices of information, sites and other resources available on computer networks; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for the collection, aggregation, processing, management, storage, analysis, and transmission of business information and data; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; electronic data storageACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 1, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 7, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 7, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 17, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 2, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 20, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 20, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 28, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 25, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 24, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 24, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 19, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 15, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance