Drawing for · MAMBA ·

USPTO serial 86392365

· MAMBA ·

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with · MAMBA ·?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arturo Perez-Guerrero

ARTURO PEREZ-GUERRERO LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO PEREZ-GUERREROP.O. BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and marketing; business management consultancy for the fruit and vegetable juice industry; marketing services for the fruit and vegetable juice industry; import and export services in the field of fruit and vegetable juice; business support and advice services for others in the operation and management of a retail business dedicated exclusively to sales of natural fruit and vegetable juices; online advertising and promotional services for the fruit and vegetable juice industry; business administration consultancy for the fruit and vegetable juice industry; public relations services; organizing trade fairs and trade shows for commercial, promotional or advertisement of fruit and vegetable juices; retail store services and online retail store services featuring natural fruit and vegetable juicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 21, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 22, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 28, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 8, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 18, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 28, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 27, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance