USPTO serial 86392559
CHILD HUNGER ENDS HERE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHILD HUNGER ENDS HERE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan S. Nemes
Alan S. Nemes Husch Blackwell LLP190 Carondelet Plaza, Suite 600St. Louis, MO 63105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | frozen, prepared or packaged meals, entrees and side dishes consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, or vegetables; prepared meats; processed meats; prepared poultry; processed poultry; processed vegetables and fruits; sausage; margarine; peanut butter; vegetable based spreads; dairy based and non-dairy based whipped topping; egg substitutes; soups; chili; vegetable-based cooking spray; packaged meat snacks; beef jerky; frankfurters; deli meats; polish sausage; knockwurst; vegetable oil; processed sunflower seeds, sunflower kernels and pumpkin seeds; frozen appetizers, namely, processed mushrooms, chicken nuggets, frozen vegetables and mozzarella sticks; snack foods, namely, potato chips | ACTIVE | Jan 25, 2011 |
| 030 | frozen, prepared or packaged meals, entrees and side dishes consisting primarily of rice or pasta; pizza; pizza kits; pot pies; sauces; ketchup; ready-to-eat, popped popcorn; microwave popcorn; unpopped popcorn; pudding; flavored and sweetened gelatins; dessert pies; ice cream novelties and frozen dairy novelties, namely, frozen confections; bread, rolls; stir fry sauce, soy sauce, marinades; mustard; salsa; hot chocolate mixes; cocoa mixes; egg rolls; chow mein noodles; rice noodles; dough-enrobed frankfurters; quesadillas; pasta; breakfast and snack-size sandwiches; breadsticks; gravy; hot dogs; frozen appetizers, namely, spring rolls and dumplings; chili powder | ACTIVE | Jan 25, 2011 |
| 035 | charitable services, namely, promoting public awareness and public advocacy to promote awareness in the field of child hunger | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | charitable fundraising services, namely, raising funds to raise awareness and improve the health of hungry children; philanthropy consultation relating to charitable fundraising | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2010 |
| 043 | providing educational services, namely, providing recipes for healthy and cost effective foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Providing information to parents and children about the importance of good nutrition and healthy preparation of meals and snacks; charitable services, namely, providing nutritional information to fight against child hunger through the distribution of educational materials in the nature of pamphlets, fliers, and booklets on nutrition | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ConAgra Foods RDM, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ConAgra Foods RDM, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named CHILD HUNGER ENDS HERE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 18, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 13, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2014 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 6, 2014 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 6, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 26, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |