USPTO serial 86393950
MX ENABLED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MX ENABLED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Preston C. Regehr
PRESTON C. REGEHR TECHLAW VENTURES, PLLC3290 MAYFLOWER WAYLEHI, UT 84043-3130UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for mobile devices for use in personal financial budgeting, financial management, and financial planning; computer software for use in personal financial management, budgeting and financial planning; video recordings in the field of personal finance budgeting, financial management, financial planning; computer software for accessing, analyzing and customizing financial information for targeted adverting and marketing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing a computer software protocol for the exchange or synchronization of electronic data via the Internet; design, development and customization of computer software and SaaS services for others; software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others which provides personal financial information, and financial services, including, financial analysis, management, financial transaction records, and bill payment; software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others in online and mobile banking, financial transaction records, personal financial management, and bill payment; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for use by others in online and mobile banking, financial record keeping, personal financial management, and bill payment; software as a service (SAAS) services for financial account aggregation, screen scraping, compiling data; application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software to provide personal financial information and financial services, including, financial analysis, financial transaction records, management, and bill payment; application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for data transfer, data cleansing or screening, data categorization, and data categorization; Website design; onsite technical consulting, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for accessing, analyzing and customizing financial information for targeted adverting and marketing; Software as a service (SAAS), featuring software for internet and digital banking, namely, for payments, loan and credit management, personal financial management, financial analysis, and other online financial functions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MoneyDesktop, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MoneyDesktop, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MX ENABLED
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 17, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 8, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 13, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 16, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |