USPTO serial 86395077
COLLABORATIVE STORYTELLING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4934305Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 5, 2016
- Examiner
- PEETE, KYLE C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COLLABORATIVE STORYTELLING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M. Martens
Lisa M. Martens Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP12275 El Camino Real, Suite 200San Diego, CA 92130-2006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business data analysis; business research and data analysis services in the field of data conversions and business intelligence featuring interactive, visual, multi-source data analysis to enable narrative-based data observations and insights and real-time data analysis and collaboration | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 2014 |
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing an on-line network environment featuring technology that enables users to share data in the field of interactive, visual, multi-source data analysis to enable narrative-based data observations and insights and real-time data analysis and collaboration; computer software services, namely, application service provider (ASP) services featuring software for use with interactive, visual, multi-source data analysis to enable narrative-based data observations and insights and real-time data analysis and collaboration | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALTERYX, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ClearStory Data Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ClearStory Data Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COLLABORATIVE STORYTELLING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 1, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |