Drawing for SSM

USPTO serial 86395246

SSM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SSM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gina Durham

Gina Durham DLA Piper LLP (US)555 Mission Street, Suite 2400San Francisco, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, system management software focused on the provisioning, configuration and change management of network infrastructure; Computer hardware and software, used alone or in combination, for interconnecting, establishing, managing, securing, monitoring, controlling, operating, and accessing networksACTIVE—
042Computer consulting services in the field of system management software focused on the provisioning, configuration and change management of network infrastructure, networking, communications, and network security; design and development of computer hardware and software; computer services, namely, cloud based monitoring and remote monitoring of network resources, security resources, system resources, application resources and application traffic flows through these resources, identification and resolutions of problems across resources and flowsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 16, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 16, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 26, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 31, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 24, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 4, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance